Slaughter & Rees Report: Confident Humility and Empathy

"There remains a wide range of post-election thoughts and feelings here in our Tuck community and far beyond. At times like these, empathy can be especially useful," say Slaughter & Rees.

It has now been a bit more than five days since the presidential election was called for Donald Trump. We suspect that every one of you readers is like us two correspondents: working to make sense of it. To do so, in the spirit of the Tuck mission we encourage you to exercise your capacities for confident humility and empathy.

Start with confident humility. Although we have earlier written here about the increasing problems with public-opinion surveys, we still sympathize with the authors of a Washington insider tip sheet—Politico’s “Playbook”—who published the following last Wednesday morning:

We were all wrong. That seems obvious, right? But we were more than wrong. We were laughably oblivious. The entire Washington political-media complex completely missed the mark. Not by inches or feet, but by miles. For a year and a half, we scoffed at those who said the polls were wrong. The polling industry is broken. We had our eyes trained on prognosticators and pundits—but they were all wrong, too. There will be plenty of time to dissect it all. The joke is on us.

To help all of us with our confidently humble dissection, for your consideration we list here five facts that we find most striking about what was perhaps the most bizarre presidential election in U.S. history.

1. Asked which candidate quality mattered most, the most popular response, cited by 39 percent of those surveyed, was “bring change.” Among those who cited this as most important, Trump was the preferred candidate by a margin of 83-14.
2. “14% of voters felt that neither candidate was qualified to serve as president. They split 69% for Mr. Trump to 15% for Mrs. Clinton. The same percentage of voters, 14%, felt that neither candidate had the temperament for the job. They split 71% for Mr. Trump to 12% for Mrs. Clinton.” (Wall Street Journal)
3. In 2008, Barack Obama received about 69.5 million votes. In 2016, Hillary Clinton received about 60.5 million. Her share of the vote, relative to Obama’s four years ago, declined among a number of key voter groups: Asian Americans (11 points), Hispanics (8 points), African Americans (7 points), unmarried women (7 points), millennials (5 points).
4. “Of the nearly 700 counties that twice sent Obama to the White House, a stunning one-third flipped to support Trump. Trump also won 194 of the 207 counties that voted for Obama either in 2008 or 2012. By contrast, of those 2,200 counties that never supported Obama, Clinton was only able to win six.” (Washington Post)  For example: “Mr. Obama had carried rural Monroe County, in Ohio’s coal belt, by 8 points in 2012. Mr. Trump won it this year by 47.” (Wall Street Journal)
5. “The big shift in Pennsylvania occurred among to lower- and middle-income voters. Among those earning less than $50,000, Clinton won by 12 points (54 percent to 42 percent); in 2012, Obama won this group by 36 points (67 percent to 31 percent).” (The Weekly Standard) “The biggest swing [in Wisconsin] was among voters earning less than $50,000. Clinton won that group by 4 points (49 percent to 45 percent); Obama won that group by 25 points (62 percent to 37 percent).” (The Weekly Standard)

Finally, a word about empathy. As with the Brexit vote in the United Kingdom and the FARC vote in Colombia, the world of late has presented a number of examples in which the interests of citizens, policymakers, and business are playing out in surprising ways that business leaders must address.

There remains a wide range of post-election thoughts and feelings here in our Tuck community and far beyond. At times like these, empathy can be especially useful. You may have voted for Hillary Clinton and feel sad. You may have voted for Donald Trump and feel glad. Regardless of for whom you voted (if anyone) and what you are currently thinking and feeling about the election, scores of millions of Americans voted differently and think and feel differently.

The United States faces enormous challenges, as will President Trump. The odds of meeting these challenges will improve as more people can empathize with the diverse experiences, ideas, and aspirations of others whose political views differ from their own. To empathize is not to relinquish your vote, or your sense of ethics and morals, or your policy preferences. But it is to exert effort to understand differences—even while those differences often remain. And that is immensely important, for from such understanding can spring broadly motivated actions that better the world.

As you and your organization start to take measure of the coming Trump presidency, best wishes honing your skills of confident humility and empathy.

---

• For Tuck, A Refined Vision